EV Innovations: 6 Annoying Features We Didn’t Want

Automotive tech is racing forward, but not all innovations are created equal. Here’s a rundown of some current car features that might be more frustrating than futuristic.

Annoying Automotive “Innovations”

1. Camera-Based Side Mirrors

Camera Mirrors Audi
Image credit: Audi

The promise: improved aerodynamics and enhanced visibility. The reality: a costly, complex system that often delivers subpar performance. Carmakers like Audi initially touted these virtual mirrors for drag reduction, but the screens are often placed in unnatural viewing positions, and image quality suffers in low light and bad weather. A heated, easily adjustable, and cleanable mirror still works best.

2. Overzealous Virtual Assistants

Renault Reno Virtual Assistant
Image credit: Renault

These digital helpers are meant to simplify tasks with voice commands, but often add unnecessary steps. Shouting commands can be more distracting than using a physical button or dial. While AI is improving voice recognition, many current systems are more gimmick than game-changer.

3. “Relaxation Mode” Overload

BMW Relaxation programmes
Image credit: BMW

Massaging seats are great, but some luxury brands take in-car relaxation too far with over-the-top programs. Ambient lighting synchronized with nature sounds and cheesy names (“Summertime Serenity,” anyone?) quickly lose their novelty. A simple comfortable seat is often enough.

4. Passenger Entertainment Screens

Porsche Passenger Screen
Image credit: Porsche

Carmakers like Porsche are convinced passengers crave their own dedicated displays. But, in reality, most passengers prefer conversation or using their own smartphones. A built-in screen offers limited utility compared to the devices people already carry.

5. Intrusive Lane Keep Assist

Porsche Passenger Screen
Image credit: Volkswagen)

While safety features are generally positive, Active Lane Keep Assist systems can be overly sensitive. These systems sometimes aggressively correct your steering, even when unnecessary. The quality varies significantly between brands, making for an unpredictable driving experience.

6. Frustrating Haptic Controls

Volkswagen ID5 Interior
Image credit: Volkswagen

Sleek, touch-sensitive buttons might look modern, but they often sacrifice usability. Accidentally brushing against them can trigger unwanted functions, forcing drivers to take their eyes off the road. Thankfully, organizations are pushing for a return to more reliable, physical controls.

Check out Polestar’s screen-heavy designs for an example of minimalist design gone too far.